![]() ![]() Security practices such as these have sought to mitigate concerns. Still, these proposed changes are far from what lawmakers and cybersecurity experts desire. ![]() That proposal is the result of discussion with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and would allow this team of experts to routinely audit the data system. data security team to handle privacy protection. This data would not be accessible by TikTok or ByteDance employees who are located outside of the country, and TikTok would create a new U.S. Now the firm is proposing a more comprehensive approach known as Project Texas, in which all data from U.S.-based users would be stored in domestic servers that are owned by the American software company Oracle. Last year, for example, a researcher argued that TikTok’s in-app browser included tracking capabilities, which could allow them to know what a user types within that app, such as passwords or credit card information. user data has been shared with the firm’s Chinese employees and the app’s developers have employed keylogging tools. But these moves did little to allay concerns, especially when evidence came to light that U.S. TikTok has previously attempted to address security concerns through various approaches, such as moving data from American users to servers housed in the United States. But Americans should keep in mind that TikTok’s connection with China is far from an anomaly in the market many US firms either manufacture in China or rely upon components developed in China. The app is run by ByteDance, a Chinese-owned company, which has led to widespread fears about national security risks, the sharing of confidential information with foreign officials, and the protection of personal privacy.įurther, Chinese companies certainly warrant detailed scrutiny given the Chinese government’s move toward tight control of its own population and surveillance of people in other countries. The reason behind these concerns is as follows. While there is an array of possible explanations for these prohibitions-for instance, critics warn the app’s algorithms amplify misinformation and disinformation, distort societal discourse, and compromise confidential information-the most cited rationale is national security.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |